I have a few points to discuss here:
1. All the Parties in the parliament should dissolve before the elections. Why? Today people go and vote for parties instead of voting the person standing there as a candidate. This way people will know the background of the candidate before going to vote him or her. This also promotes the awareness that seeing the popularity of the party, a candidate with a criminal background joins it.
2. When someone in the party has the authority to give tickets for the membership of a party, he or she has to beware about the social background of the person about to get the ticket.
3. There should be only two parties: ruling and opposition, where the most popular candidate should get the position in the ruling party, and as the rank falls, the chances of him or her to be taken in opposition.
4. When a person performs well, as a promotion (from opposition to the ruling party), should be swapped with the person from the ruling party, not performing that well.
5. When a member of parliament, whether in the ruling party or opposition, is not performing well, instead of people go and blame him or her directly, must only direct the attention of the speaker or president, about the work, where it will be the task of the speaker or president to blame the person responsible. This may save precious time of the parliament.
6. I might have written this earlier, but, when a fund is allocated for a social welfare and development cause, for any of city, state or national level, people who should get affected should know of this. This allocation should not get approved unless general mass approves it. Scams and money laundering should reduce if this is cautiously done.
Following are the articles for your health and mind. No country tends to become great if people are not thinkers and visionaries. We should cure our minds and check our health frequently to move ahead.
More things to add:
The religion when were originated, they were as a result of past experiences of the noted people in the society. They were pure then, but when the reigns passed through their high commands, the purity of the religions was lost.
So I feel it is the person who many people trust as the top notch of the society, getting carried away in the things that make the entire clan and therefore the history of the nation suffers.
Islam was a huge success and still is. It is based on how an ideal lifestyle of a common man to the ranking of those of the elites of the society) should be. But then people tried to mess with its purity. They brought the concept of "Shia", "Sunni", "Mashrif", "Maghrib", just when people were brought under one umbrella of universal brotherhood with the notion that a portion of God exists in everything, living, dead or non-living. This made people fight over unnecessary things, and do you realize that many nations around the world as in Africa and Indonesia; Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan should be in the league of one United Nations of Islam or so?
Hinduism was in a state of purity when every individual was given a sect depending upon attributes he or she shows up after the age of 25, that is "Bhramcharya". And the sects you know as "Brahmana": people in service of welfare using the knowledge they have; "Kshatriya": people who protect; "Vaishya": traders and occupations related to commerce and economy; "Shudhras": people with laborious and industrial skills to serve other sects. But these were barred to do anything else after given their sects. In ages, these divisions were made hereditary and the division was not beneficial, as the people fought on it due to the limitations of rights. Things that were for order now brought chaos.
Christianity: Though it helped almost the whole of the world together, there were elements of racism, fascism as well. It split the religion into Catholics, protestants. Now the whole process initially was to bring people together, under the umbrella of universal brotherhood, as the religion spread through nations, become the element of hatred.
So even when the Britishers were able to unite much of the Earth, the mutual differences, ego, thinking and ideologies split them into United States, United Kingdom, South Africa, Australia and so on, when they could have been one instead of fighting. Civil Wars (America) and Ashes (Cricket) could not have taken place.
So I believe, it is not the religion, but the people. And the majority of the people follow one spearhead of the community, and so everything would be good if this person does things absolutely right, favoring the community.
It is up to the common man to understand, be patriotic and fight for righteousness if it is necessary. There should be no mob-rule. Moral Science education begins at home, so this is imparted on a wide scale.
1. All the Parties in the parliament should dissolve before the elections. Why? Today people go and vote for parties instead of voting the person standing there as a candidate. This way people will know the background of the candidate before going to vote him or her. This also promotes the awareness that seeing the popularity of the party, a candidate with a criminal background joins it.
2. When someone in the party has the authority to give tickets for the membership of a party, he or she has to beware about the social background of the person about to get the ticket.
3. There should be only two parties: ruling and opposition, where the most popular candidate should get the position in the ruling party, and as the rank falls, the chances of him or her to be taken in opposition.
4. When a person performs well, as a promotion (from opposition to the ruling party), should be swapped with the person from the ruling party, not performing that well.
5. When a member of parliament, whether in the ruling party or opposition, is not performing well, instead of people go and blame him or her directly, must only direct the attention of the speaker or president, about the work, where it will be the task of the speaker or president to blame the person responsible. This may save precious time of the parliament.
6. I might have written this earlier, but, when a fund is allocated for a social welfare and development cause, for any of city, state or national level, people who should get affected should know of this. This allocation should not get approved unless general mass approves it. Scams and money laundering should reduce if this is cautiously done.
Following are the articles for your health and mind. No country tends to become great if people are not thinkers and visionaries. We should cure our minds and check our health frequently to move ahead.
More things to add:
The religion when were originated, they were as a result of past experiences of the noted people in the society. They were pure then, but when the reigns passed through their high commands, the purity of the religions was lost.
So I feel it is the person who many people trust as the top notch of the society, getting carried away in the things that make the entire clan and therefore the history of the nation suffers.
Islam was a huge success and still is. It is based on how an ideal lifestyle of a common man to the ranking of those of the elites of the society) should be. But then people tried to mess with its purity. They brought the concept of "Shia", "Sunni", "Mashrif", "Maghrib", just when people were brought under one umbrella of universal brotherhood with the notion that a portion of God exists in everything, living, dead or non-living. This made people fight over unnecessary things, and do you realize that many nations around the world as in Africa and Indonesia; Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan should be in the league of one United Nations of Islam or so?
Hinduism was in a state of purity when every individual was given a sect depending upon attributes he or she shows up after the age of 25, that is "Bhramcharya". And the sects you know as "Brahmana": people in service of welfare using the knowledge they have; "Kshatriya": people who protect; "Vaishya": traders and occupations related to commerce and economy; "Shudhras": people with laborious and industrial skills to serve other sects. But these were barred to do anything else after given their sects. In ages, these divisions were made hereditary and the division was not beneficial, as the people fought on it due to the limitations of rights. Things that were for order now brought chaos.
Christianity: Though it helped almost the whole of the world together, there were elements of racism, fascism as well. It split the religion into Catholics, protestants. Now the whole process initially was to bring people together, under the umbrella of universal brotherhood, as the religion spread through nations, become the element of hatred.
So even when the Britishers were able to unite much of the Earth, the mutual differences, ego, thinking and ideologies split them into United States, United Kingdom, South Africa, Australia and so on, when they could have been one instead of fighting. Civil Wars (America) and Ashes (Cricket) could not have taken place.
So I believe, it is not the religion, but the people. And the majority of the people follow one spearhead of the community, and so everything would be good if this person does things absolutely right, favoring the community.
It is up to the common man to understand, be patriotic and fight for righteousness if it is necessary. There should be no mob-rule. Moral Science education begins at home, so this is imparted on a wide scale.
